Nonprofit Leader Guide· a Bicycle Guide

Coming soon · Book Profile

Compensation: Theory, Evidence, and Strategic Implications

An interdisciplinary, research-based examination of how organizations decide pay level, pay structure, and pay basis, and how those compensation choices affect individual and organizational outcomes.

A profile of this book is on the way.

Get the book →

What it’s about

Compensation costs comprise the majority of operating expenses in most economies, yet managers and scholars disagree fundamentally about what pay practices actually work. Drawing on economics, psychology, management, and sociology, Gerhart and Rynes integrate theory with empirical evidence across the three central compensation decisions—how much to pay (pay level), how to differentiate pay within organizations (pay structure), and how to pay (pay basis)—to reveal what is known, what is contested, and what remains to be discovered. The book debunks influential misconceptions (e.g., that money is a weak motivator or that extrinsic rewards reliably undermine intrinsic motivation), reinterprets prominent findings on pay dispersion and merit pay, and connects micro-level motivational and sorting processes to macro-level strategy and firm performance. With careful attention to effect sizes, practical significance, and the distinction between incentive and sorting effects, it equips researchers and advanced students to design better studies and helps practitioners understand the risks and opportunities of alternative pay strategies.

The through-line

Who it’s for
A scholar, doctoral student, or thoughtful HR/compensation practitioner who wants to understand and design pay systems that actually improve organizational and individual outcomes.
The problem
Conflicting theories and noisy evidence make it hard to know which pay practices (level, structure, basis) work and under what conditions. They feel uncertain and overwhelmed by disciplinary disagreements, popular myths, and the high stakes of getting pay decisions wrong.
The plan
  1. Start with the simplest decision (pay level) and build complexity toward structure, basis, and strategy.
  2. Distinguish incentive effects from sorting effects in every pay decision.
  3. Match pay practices to context (vertical, horizontal, and internal alignment) while recognizing some best practices.
  4. Weigh tradeoffs of each program and consider portfolios to balance risks and benefits.
  5. Evaluate evidence using effect sizes, multilevel designs, and longitudinal data rather than statistical significance alone.
The payoff
Pay systems aligned with strategy that motivate effort and attract/retain the right people. · Confident, evidence-based compensation decisions that avoid common myths. · Research that measures mediating processes and practical significance across organizational levels.

See our guide

Related profiles we’ve built

Additional reading